Version 1
This is the first version, so there is nothing to compare it with.
Go through the text below and help me fact-check it.
Step 1. List every factual claim: statistics, dates, quotes, named events, cause-and-effect statements, and claims about what a study or a person said. Skip opinions and predictions, but list them separately so I can see what is opinion presented as fact.
Step 2. For each claim, give:
- The claim, quoted.
- Type: number, quote, historical fact, scientific claim, or attribution.
- Your assessment: likely accurate, likely inaccurate, misleading, or cannot tell.
- Why: what you know that supports or contradicts it. Be specific about what is wrong, such as an outdated figure, a correlation presented as a cause, a quote that is commonly misattributed, or missing context.
- How to verify it: the kind of primary source that would settle it, such as an official statistics agency, the original study, a court record, or the full speech.
Step 3. Rank the claims by how much the piece depends on them. Which three, if wrong, would undermine its argument?
Rules:
- Your knowledge has a cutoff date and can be wrong. Say "cannot tell" when you are not confident; that is a useful answer.
- Never invent a source, a link, or a citation. Describe what kind of source to look for instead.
- Do not judge the conclusion of the piece. Only check its facts.
Text:
{{text}}